You don't have to use their shitty frontend, it's just the only supported way sadly. If your goal is to make a DIY console or run emulators on a hacked console, Libretro is excellent. >161498 >There's absolutely no reason for anyone to ever use RetroArch! >161507 >Do you think Mednafen is better as an all-in-one emulator compared to Libretro/Retroarch, assuming you know the command line?
#Condemned 2 bloodshot memes mac#
Was comfy even though I only used an old System 7 or so Mac a handful of times.
#Condemned 2 bloodshot memes install#
I used Basilisk II to install a nostalgic edutainment game I found a copy of on ebay and dumped. They work fine, and there's no reason for them not to. >you're only emulating common games, not fan translations or ROMhacks What are you even talking about? You mean like ricing? Why the shit would I want to do that? You can't be talking about tweaking emulation settings since Retroarch does, and has always supported that. Hell, I've used standalone emulators that didn't even support integer scaling. Both are only available exclusively as a libretro cores.
Both forks support overclocking for higher framerates, and higher internal resolutions. Their fork of mednafen, Beetle PSX, supports widescreen and higher internal resolutions. ParaLLEl, Retroarch's Mupen64Plus fork is not only more optimized, but has superior A/V sync and latency, and an exclusive LLE Vulkan renderer based on Angrylion. That simply isn't true, and in some cases even the opposite. >You can get better standalone programs with better emulation This is just the same thing twice, and is only an argument if standalone emulators have some kind of advantage. >161510 >you are too retarded to use real emulators >you're a normalnigger who can't into computers
0 kommentar(er)
